Arqueologia join the PCI friendly journals' list! It's an journal of the Kvasir Publishing group (@Kvasir_P
). If you work on South America: 1) put a preprint wherever you want, 2) make it peer-reviewed by @PCI_Archaeology
, 3) publish easily!

Another new PCI Friendly journal: @Heritage_MDPI
, from the @MDPIOpenAccess
group, joins the list. You can thus be sure now that they will welcome your manuscript even after the PCI complete process, and they may use the Open reviews as their own, if appropriate.

Welcome a new PCI Friendly journal: Archäologische Informationen from @DGUF1969
! It is an diamond journal, that will accept your already peer-reviewed preprint, and will use PCI reviews and recommendations for their own review processes, if appropriate.

3/3 This is the fifth recommendation of @PCI_Archaeo ! We will continue to peer-review your manuscripts and make it a free to publish / free to read piece of citable academic work ! Try us, this is the way to go !

2/3 Recommended by Otis Crandell (@archaeo_cafe
) for PCI Archaeo based on published reviews by Georges Abou Diwan (from @LebaneseUni
) and an anonymous reviewer

1/3 A new peer-reviewed by @PCI_Archaeo: J. Lewis (2020). Probabilistic Modelling using Monte Carlo Simulation for Incorporating Uncertainty in Least Cost Path Results: a Roman Road Case Study.

If you want to know your OpenAccess score, just enter your ORCID in here:
(and if you're French, you can try this one: and see my video here
My score is 97% (after some work!), what's yours?!

There are PCI friendly journals, that accept to take into account the reviews and may propose a specific process (rapid review, no new review). If the paper is not recommended, we do not publish the reviews and decisions. If you're not working in , check if there is not a PCI in your domain here

Show thread

Here to discover Masotondt and to promote a way of post-publication peer-review: you put your manuscript on an Open Archive (zenodo, OSFpreprints, bioRxiv etc.), you ask for our community to review it. We make a classic but fully open peer review (open review, open answers, open decisions) and if the work is good, we "recommend" it. It is therefore a quality article, citable, and if you need it, you can still publish it in a traditional journal. Everything FREE.

Not being allowed to make a research on the content of messages on this server does not sound very easy to find Pouets that could be of interest. Why is this blocked? I'm new to Mastodon maybe there is a very good reason, this is a true question.

Fediscience is the social network for scientists.